bluescreenwhitedragon: TRANSCEND GAME (Default)
★ Seto Kaiba ★  ([personal profile] bluescreenwhitedragon) wrote2018-06-12 07:13 pm
Entry tags:

IC Inbox

"This is Intensity. Leave a message."

[personal profile] sancrimony 2019-05-30 06:23 am (UTC)(link)
[ looks directly at his own lap, this is pet shaming and he's shamed ]

I suppose it was because I had mistakenly told a child that he could kill me in a game.
Edited 2019-05-30 06:23 (UTC)
sancrimony: (🕂 182)

[personal profile] sancrimony 2019-05-30 06:29 am (UTC)(link)
. . .

He learned about the trial, and he asked me if I would do it again . . . so I said that I would, so it seemed appropriate at the time since he seemed to be compromised in such a way that perhaps . . .

Uhm . . .

In the end, he told Whisky-san about the matter instead, and I was scolded . . .
sancrimony: (♱ 032)

[personal profile] sancrimony 2019-05-30 06:48 am (UTC)(link)
[ finally, twisting his fingers a bit ]

It isn't something so simple as that incident, but . . .

[ . . . ]

Anubis-san said that he would give up on living if things were to continue like this.

Dia-sama . . . I couldn't convince her to so much as protect herself - she would certainly give up rather than continue living.

Now, even Whisky-san - someone who . . . someone who would value survival over everything else, would put himself to the side for me . . .

. . .

If it would ignite in people the desire to live, and so the desire to fight, I could feel more confident about this. But, as it stands - to my own loved ones, if such is the case here, then what have I done but exacerbate such a self-sabotaging desire in them?

Moreover, you saw how it was in Harumaki-san's live - certainly, there was anger, but there seemed to be at least a few people who would rather let themselves die instead of fight.

Something like that - mm, my own position as "villain" isn't enough to do anything for that, and moreover, my own unit would suffer a despair to the point of joining those numbers.

I don't know what to do from this point forward, but . . . I know, at least, that what I'm doing isn't effective enough. So, I must redirect course somehow. Becoming more extreme wouldn't help . . .

I would still look to protect my own unit, naturally - naturally, I would spill blood as I needed. But, if that sort of middling ground that I was given praise for -

If the intent of that time was simply to protect my unit, without doing anything further - then, is there a point left to this villain role. . . ? In the first place, what is the point of continuing on in order to protect this world, if the people in it no longer wish to exist. . . ?
Edited 2019-05-30 06:49 (UTC)

[personal profile] sancrimony 2019-05-30 06:54 am (UTC)(link)
Mm. At the moment, it seems like there's discord enough sewn about that this would not be the case.
sancrimony: (☦ 090)

[personal profile] sancrimony 2019-05-30 07:01 am (UTC)(link)
[ looking up to him now ]

. . .

Is this something you were waiting for. . . ?
sancrimony: (🕈 216)

[personal profile] sancrimony 2019-05-30 07:13 am (UTC)(link)
. . .

I do admit, it's a bit difficult, just a bit. . .

To be honest, I thought strongly about it, in the auction. However, since my unit comes first, I naturally had some form of leash . . .

And, with how quickly everything devolved -

Ideally, there would be a limit to the destruction. If the upper limit is set by the Producers, then I didn't mind reaching it, but . . . that game was one with an upper limit only defined by our own cruelty. So, I quickly decided against it.
sancrimony: (🕆 049)

[personal profile] sancrimony 2019-05-30 07:26 am (UTC)(link)
Mmm.

For the near future, I have someone I must tend to . . .

For the far future, I have the goal I have always had.

But, for here - in this foreseeable future, in this world . . . beyond tending to that person . . .

[ quieter ]

To be honest, I'm at a loss.
sancrimony: (☨ 140)

[personal profile] sancrimony 2019-05-30 07:41 am (UTC)(link)
Between staying and going, that much is already clear, I'm sure?

After all, I want to support you and C-dono.
sancrimony: (☩ 069)

[personal profile] sancrimony 2019-05-31 02:55 am (UTC)(link)
Mm. . . ?

You didn't.

[ said, as a prompt for him to go on ]
sancrimony: (🕈 225)

[personal profile] sancrimony 2019-05-31 04:10 am (UTC)(link)
. . . Since we had drawn our contract - no, even before then, I have watched you. For the sake of learning what your character is, and therefore, where your will lies.

[ with a pause, as he looks up to him ]

Then, I should learn the distinction between whether I should be a Servant that can independently further your goals, even if it might be in defiance to the orders you give - or whether I should be a Servant that prioritizes your wellbeing, while also carrying the respect to stay my hand when you fight your own battles.

For as long as I have been your Servant, I have stayed my hand in public, for the purposes of creating that villainous mask. Though I have felt strongly the urge to involve myself, I had yet to do so, this being among the chief reasons as to why. However, with such removed, there is no need to hide that any longer.

[ with a hum, thoughtful for a moment ]

What you desire is a person, a self-sufficient tool - a companion, perhaps. One who would, honestly, speak with you - one who would, honestly, disagree with you. With even just that much, it's plain to see that - between the two . . .

. . . It's up to my best judgment, isn't it? In such situations, when it is appropriate to be a Servant that respects or a Servant that protects, a Servant who would further your goals or a Servant who would criticize your methods.

Am I wrong?